.
Affirmative Action vs. Race-Neutral Admissions: A Case Study | WSJ > .Because Asians typically perform well, they risk being subject to double discrimination: not only are they not protected as a minority, but many better-qualified Asians are passed over in order to provided whites with those positions not reserved for blacks.
In some cases, fairness will be achieved by rewarding the inherently-able but opportunity-disadvantaged. In others instances, productivity and competence will flounder.
Implicit in the policy is an assumption that those of the protected ethnicity are inherently inferior --------- hence the need for protective policies to impose equity. This too is racist and demeaning to those who have not been provided with opportunity and encouragement from a young enough age.
Imposing "equity" also engenders resentment and distrust, activating "white supremacist" backlash. Politicized backlash contributed to an ill-advised election result. Racist intolerance evoked the disgusting reactivity > of Trump's unsubstantiated, contra-fact blaming > of an air tragedy on "DEI hires".
Imposing "equity" also encourages the politicized a priori assumption that a "DEI hire" must have been elevated despite lack of merit. This too is racist because distrust has replaced the pre-DEI assumption that blacks who advanced despite race, must have been more capable than white competitors.
Hence, capable individuals are tainted by accusations of:
"Didn't Earn It."
"Don't Even Invest."
"Deliberate Exclusionary Insistence."
"Dooming Education Intentionally."
More accurate, as a result of Trump's disgusting politicizing > of the tragic Washington air collision:
The problem is not DEI, the problem is DJTDEI = Donald's Extreme Ignorance
DEI... Donald and Elon's Incompetence
Donald's Enormous Incompetence
Donald's Egotistical Inhumanity
DEI = Don Eric Ivanka
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.